<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <title>Trends in the Living Networks</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://rossdawsonblog.com/" />
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://rossdawsonblog.com/atom.xml" />
    <id>tag:rossdawsonblog.com,2008-03-05://9</id>
    <updated>2008-05-08T22:30:08Z</updated>
    <subtitle>Ross Dawson&apos;s Trends in the Living Networks blog offers high-level commentary on developments in our intensely networked world, and how it is coming to life. The blog is primarily intended for a general business audience, in identifying critical technology, social, and business trends and their implications.</subtitle>
    <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type Publishing Platform 4.01</generator>

<entry>
    <title>MySpace embraces “data availability” – a major step forward to the Wide Open Web</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://rossdawsonblog.com/weblog/archives/2008/05/myspace_embrace.html" />
    <id>tag:rossdawsonblog.com,2008://9.1428</id>

    <published>2008-05-08T22:20:38Z</published>
    <updated>2008-05-08T22:30:08Z</updated>

    <summary>MySpace has just announced its Data Availability program, which includes adoption of a range of DataPortability standards, and data sharing with Ebay, Yahoo, and Twitter. Detailed coverage of this at TechCrunch, ReadWriteWeb, VentureBeat, and many others (see Techmeme). At the...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Ross Dawson</name>
        <uri>http://www.rossdawsonblog.com</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Technology trends" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Web 2.0" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="dataportability" label="dataportability" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="myspace" label="myspace" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="wideopenweb" label="wide open web" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://rossdawsonblog.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>MySpace has just announced its Data Availability program, which includes adoption of a range of <a href="http://dataportability.org/">DataPortability </a>standards, and data sharing with Ebay, Yahoo, and Twitter. Detailed coverage of this at <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/08/myspace-embraces-data-portability-partners-with-yahoo-ebay-and-twitter/">TechCrunch</a>, <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/myspace_data_availability.php">ReadWriteWeb</a>, <a href="http://venturebeat.com/2008/05/08/myspace-to-launch-data-availability-new-ways-to-access-its-data-through-third-parties/">VentureBeat</a>, and <a href="http://www.techmeme.com/080508/h1755">many others (see Techmeme)</a>. At the same time, MySpace has joined Google, Facebook, Microsoft, LinkedIn, Digg and others on the DataPortability project. <a href="http://dataportability.tumblr.com/post/34138755">DataPortability notes</a>:</p>

<blockquote><em>While the participation and endorsement of large vendors such as MySpace in the DataPortability project is a key part of our overall goals of industry wide user-centric data portability, we’d like to re-iterate that the project is an open, grass-roots initiative. This means that individuals, startups and medium scale companies are just as welcome to join the process and have just as much capacity to influence or even lead the discussions and the outcomes.</em></blockquote>
An important part of the background to this is that <a href="http://benmetcalfe.com/blog/">Ben Metcalfe </a>is Director of Engineering for the MySpace Platform. Ben has played an important role in getting MySpace to understand the importance of an open approach (see <a href="http://benmetcalfe.com/blog/index.php/2008/05/08/myspace-joins-dataportability-announces-first-implementation/">his thoughts on this announcement</a>), drawing on his experience in leading the <a href="http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/">BBC’s developer platform</a>, and his existing involvement with DataPortability. I caught up with Ben recently in San Francisco and we discussed where data portability is going. Absolutely the <a href="http://rossdawsonblog.com/weblog/archives/2008/05/living_networks_3.html">leadership of the large players</a> is fundamental to driving this.

<p>This year there will be many announcements of this kind, but this is a particularly important one, both through the visibility of the announcement, and even more importantly the value of what it enables. The millions who are using multiple platforms such as MySpace, Yahoo, Twitter and so on will be able to bring together their activities, and clearly see that we are transcending the closed web. People will begin to understand that the natural format of the web is open, with our activities naturally flowing across applications. Expectations will heighten, and the already rapid pace towards the Wide Open Web will accelerate.</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Laurie Lock Lee on Governance in an Networked World</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://rossdawsonblog.com/weblog/archives/2008/05/laurie_lock_lee.html" />
    <id>tag:rossdawsonblog.com,2008://9.1427</id>

    <published>2008-05-07T22:45:13Z</published>
    <updated>2008-05-07T22:53:09Z</updated>

    <summary>Laurie Lock Lee is one of the top practitioners globally in network thinking. I first came across his work in the mid-1990s, when he was one of the first people in world applying social network analysis approaches to organizations, for...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Ross Dawson</name>
        <uri>http://www.rossdawsonblog.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="laurielocklee" label="laurie lock lee" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://rossdawsonblog.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Laurie Lock Lee is one of the top practitioners globally in network thinking. I first came across his work in the mid-1990s, when he was one of the first people in world applying social network analysis approaches to organizations, for his then-employer BHP. He moved to CSC with the acquisition of BHP’s technology group, and last year set up his own firm <a href="http://www.optimice.com.au/">Optimice </a>with Cai Kjaer. I have featured some of Laurie’s work in the last two <a href="http://futureexploration.net/future-of-media/">Future of Media Reports</a>, including a high-level view of <a href="http://rossdawsonblog.com/weblog/archives/2006/08/analyzing_media.html">media industry networks</a>, and a detailed analysis of the <a href="http://rossdawsonblog.com/weblog/archives/2007/08/media_industry_1.html">impact of a large acquisition on the Australian media industry landscape</a>. Many other great reports and industry network maps are available from the <a href="http://www.optimice.com.au/">Optimice website</a>.</p>

<p>Laurie has just launched a new blog on <a href="http://governanceandnetworks.blogspot.com/">Governance in a Networked World</a>. He notes that it’s important to find the right scope and topic for a blog, and I think this is a fantastic one. As I wrote in releasing <a href="http://rossdawsonblog.com/weblog/archives/2008/05/living_networks_3.html">Chapter 3 of <em>Living Networks</em></a>, governance is perhaps the most important perspective on how organizations need to deal with a networked world. There are certainly risks to be understood and dealt with, but there are also opportunities that must be recognized and addressed. Business and government leaders are abrogating their responsibilities if they do not engage with the issues raised by our hyperconnected, networked world. Laurie says on <a href="http://governanceandnetworks.blogspot.com/2008/05/inaugural-post.html">his inaugural post</a>:</p>

<blockquote><em>Now to the governance bit. The old conglomerates grew up in an era when hierarchical control was the order of the day. Decision making necessarily travelled up and down the chain of command. Governance was all "top down". Today many of the conglomerates have largely disappeared. Organisational structures have been flattened to facilitate agility and faster decision making. And governance systems have done what? Have they changed substantially at all? The focus is still top down control. The expectation is that senior management can "control" everything. In my view the networked business environment has worked against senior management's ability to "control" the business. I believe the paradigm has shifted from one of "control" to one of "influence". Until governance mechanisms are adapted to this change I believe they will continue to add cost and reduce value to the very organisations that they are trying to help.</em>
</blockquote>
I look forward to Laurie’s insights on his blog. ]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Living Networks - Chapter 3: The New Organization - Free Download and Commentary</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://rossdawsonblog.com/weblog/archives/2008/05/living_networks_3.html" />
    <id>tag:rossdawsonblog.com,2008://9.1426</id>

    <published>2008-05-07T09:06:55Z</published>
    <updated>2008-05-07T09:23:41Z</updated>

    <summary>Download Chapter 3 of Living Networks on Emerging Technologies Every chapter of Living Networks is being released on this blog as a free download, together with commentary and updated perspectives since its original publication in 2002. For the full Table...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Ross Dawson</name>
        <uri>http://www.rossdawsonblog.com</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Collaboration" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Living Networks book" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="blurringboundaries" label="blurring boundaries" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="informationstandards" label="information standards" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="livingnetworks" label="living networks" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="rossdawson" label="ross dawson" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://rossdawsonblog.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.rossdawsonblog.com/LivingNetworks_Chapter3.pdf"><strong>Download Chapter 3 of <em>Living Networks</em> on Emerging Technologies</strong></a></p>

<p>Every chapter of <em><a href="http://www.livingnetworksbook.com/">Living Networks</a></em> is being released on this blog as a free download, together with commentary and updated perspectives since its original publication in 2002. </p>

<p>For the <a href="http://livingnetworksbook.com/downloads.php">full Table of Contents and free chapter downloads</a> see the <a href="http://livingnetworksbook.com/"><em>Living Networks</em> website</a> or the <a href="http://rossdawsonblog.com/weblog/archives/2008/04/launch_of_livin.html">Book Launch/ Preface to the Anniversary Edition</a>.</p>

<p><br />
<strong><em><a href="http://www.rossdawsonblog.com/LivingNetworks_Chapter3.pdf">Living Networks - Chapter 3: The New Organization</a></em> <br />
Leadership Across Blurring Boundaries</strong></p>

<p><em><strong>OVERVIEW</strong>: The boundaries between organizations are blurring as technology reduces the costs of transactions. It is becoming essential for companies to work closely with their customers, suppliers, and partners, however this involves very real risks. In this world leadership is required to take whole industries and supply chains into new ways of working based on transparency, collaboration, and sharing value. Those that embrace the networks and lead the way forward will reap the greatest rewards.</em></p>

<p><br />
<strong>Chapter 3 of <em>Living Networks</em> - Commentary and updated perspectives</strong></p>

<p>From the original writing of <em>Living Networks</em> I felt that the issues raised in chapter 3 were at the heart of what the living networks are about.  The key concept here is that of 'blurring boundaries', something we are experiencing across every domain of society and business, including organizations, industries, and countries. </p>

<p>A quotation I discovered since writing the book, and have used extensively over the last years in my presentations, expresses this perfectly:</p>

<blockquote>"Finite players play within boundaries; infinite players play with boundaries."</blockquote>

<p>This quote comes from the delightful and wise book <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Finite-Infinite-Games-James-Carse/dp/0345341848/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1210151468&sr=1-1">Finite and Infinite Games</a> by James Carse, which looks at how we either limit ourselves or open ourselves to infinite opportunity in our lives. While it was published in 1986, its messages are more relevant than ever today.</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>The example I used of Corporate Executive Board as a listed company that creates value from and for its network of corporate members still stands out today. There has been a gradual shift to network business models, but it is early yet. As I wrote, it is necessary to reconceive what organizations are about:</p>

<blockquote><strong>The art of management is now about positioning the firm to extract value from its participation in a
broad economic network.
</strong></blockquote>
In the chapter I identified four risks that were holding back executives from creating value across boundaries:<BR>
* Information loss<BR>
* Systems security<BR>
* Reputation<BR>
* Ability to extract value<BR>
<BR>
These themes are echoed in the draft <a href="http://www.rossdawsonblog.com/weblog/archives/2008/02/an_enterprise_2.html">Enterprise 2.0 Governance Framework</a> I created earlier this year. Arguably <a href="http://futureexploration.net/e2ef/what-is-enterprise.html">Enterprise 2.0</a> is a specific manifestation of the same issues that have been at play in business over the last decade. However it is bringing to the fore fundamental issues of business structure that go far beyond the impact of technology.

<p>Because of these risks and the massive inertia that is present in any large system, leadership is absolutely required to shift organizations, industries, and business ecosystems. In the book I used examples including Herman Miller, XBRL, and Ingram Micro. Looking over the last five years, Google is perhaps the most obvious example of industry leadership, primarily in how it has offered open interfaces to many of its applications. In the process it has created vast momentum to openness, making it very hard for any participants in related markets to implement closed business strategies.</p>

<p>Industry information standards have come a long way over the last years, but still have much further to go. XBRL still has great potential today, however progress has been disappointingly slow. RosettaNet has created much value over the last years, but it could have been much greater than it has. However today new industry standard initiatives across real-world sectors such as real estate, manufacturing, and distribution are transforming how value is created.</p>

<p>Industry standards grow by layers. XML has provided a platform for a series of initiatives and approaches to sharing information. Today we are entering a new phase, with standards such as <a href="http://openid.net/">OpenID</a>, <a href="http://dataportability.org/">DataPortability</a>, <a href="http://microformats.org/">Microformats</a>, and others potentially establishing a platform for data and identity to be moved freely across applications and locations. Given the past five years experience, we can expect immense value will be created. But we can also expect it to be often a frustratingly slow process.</p>

<p>I have since expanded considerably on my original four recommendations for providing leadership in a network economy, including on <a href="http://rossdawsonblog.com/weblog/archives/2007/09/defining_inform.html">information sharing policies</a> and <a href="http://rossdawsonblog.com/weblog/archives/2006/03/seven_megatrend_7.html">building transparency</a>. </p>

<p>The same recommendations still apply. In the big picture, we are still in the early stages of a vast trend to blurring boundaries in business. The simple fact is that those who provide the leadership necessary for these changes will create and take far more value than their followers.</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Thoughts from the Walkley Public Affairs conference</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://rossdawsonblog.com/weblog/archives/2008/05/thoughts_from_t.html" />
    <id>tag:rossdawsonblog.com,2008://9.1424</id>

    <published>2008-05-06T10:44:25Z</published>
    <updated>2008-05-06T11:08:53Z</updated>

    <summary>Today I spoke at the Walkley Public Affairs conference, organized by the MEAA, the peak body representing workers in the Australian media industry. I spoke on the Enterprise 2.0 panel, running through many of the issues I&apos;ve raised on the...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Ross Dawson</name>
        <uri>http://www.rossdawsonblog.com</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Enterprise 2.0" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Future of media" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="enterprise20" label="enterprise 2.0" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="publicrelations" label="public relations" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://rossdawsonblog.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Today I spoke at the <a href="http://publicaffairs.alliance.org.au">Walkley Public Affairs conference</a>, organized by the <a href="http://alliance.org.au/">MEAA</a>, the peak body representing workers in the Australian media industry. I spoke on the Enterprise 2.0 panel, running through many of the issues I've raised on the <a href="http://www.futureexploration.net/e2ef/blog/">Enterprise 2.0 Forum blog</a>.</p>

<p>Here are a few summarized comments and reflections on what I heard while I was at the event from late morning to the end of the first day.</p>

<p>As I walked in, Sam Mostyn of IAG was saying, reflecting on what she'd seen at the insurer, that 'what builds loyalty and commitment is trust'. That is a fundamentally important point. Corporate loyalty is evanescent today, particularly with younger workers. The only potential source of loyalty is trusting your employees. Not trusting them automatically results in zero loyalty. This is deeply relevant to the issue of <a href="http://rossdawsonblog.com/weblog/archives/2007/10/implementing_we.html">blocking or allowing social networks in the enterprise</a>.</p>

<p>On the next panel, <a href="http://blog.futurestreetconsulting.com/">Mark Pesce</a> commented that social networks in Australia are extremely shallow. Outrageous news travels very fast. At the <a href="http://www.thefutureofjournalism.org.au/">Future of Journalism conference</a> comments that <a href="http://blogs.guardian.co.uk/greenslade/">Roy Greenslade</a> made about Andrew Jaspan, editor of The Age, were immediately heard. Messages propagate ubiquitously, in this case enabled by journalists in the audience live-blogging the event. Those who were interested in what Greenslade said heard about it almost instantaneously. Mark describes Twitter as his twenty-first century brain trust, extending his capabilities by giving him access to many with complementary knowledge. He describes this as 'hyperempowerment'.</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>Mark told the story of how a friend of his, Gregory P,  had twittered about a very poor experience consulting to a large company, and word had very quickly spread, despite Gregory's declining to share - so far - the company's name. If he does name the company, it will find it harder to hire and engage talented people. Reputation can directly impact a company's value. According to Mark, there are many companies that will not stand the scrutiny of a connected world. This story and the Greenslade-Jaspan event is covered in detail on Mark’s blog under the title <a href="http://blog.futurestreetconsulting.com/?p=48">The Nuclear Option</a>, while the <a href="http://blog.futurestreetconsulting.com/?p=49">slides plus audio of his presentation today</a> is on his blog and below.</p>

<p><object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/-0CE-4uokuQ"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/-0CE-4uokuQ" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object></p>

<p>In question time Mark said that he has a strict view that there are only successful and unsuccessful strategies, and he believes that this view will eventually become dominant. Successful short-term strategies may not be successful in the long-term. </p>

<p>This is an interesting perspective, and I think is very relevant in the context of organizational change. There are many companies that are currently successful and seem to believe that this  implies future success. However their underlying strategies may in fact be substantially different from each other, and result in significant differences in their success over the next decade or more as the environment shifts dramatically.</p>

<p>Sheryle Moon, who recently moved from her role as CEO of Australian Information Industry Association to Director of <a href="http://www.juliaross.com/">Julia Ross</a>, a large recruitment firm, spoke about her experiences at the two organizations. </p>

<p>Sheryle said that two things were important to her when she left AIIA: her mobile phone number and the content on her blog. The latter she has transferred to a new blog, <a href="http://www.talkingtechnology.com.au/">Talking Technology</a>.</p>

<p>When Sheryle was recruited to Julia Ross, she was surprised to be asked by the headhunter for references. She asked him why he didn't look at her Facebook friends, and told him that's who she'd put him in touch with in any case. </p>

<p>Colin MacLeod runs communications for the <a href="http://www.afl.com.au/">Australian Football League</a> (AFL), where despite moving over from Goldman Sachs, he has been staggered him by the degree of scrutiny they get. Five times as many journalists in Australia cover AFL as cover federal parliament. One player, Ben Cousins, has received 100,000 media mentions.  He believes that checking facts "is no longer a core media discipline". Talkback radio is rife with misinformation with no corrections. </p>

<p>The AFL draws on Young & Rubicam's SEER product to track blog connections and influence, and use this to respond to online conversations. Colin acknowledges that they haven't yet worked out precisely how to respond yet, but they’re working on it. One of the insights from the SEER analyzes they did is that the second most influential online source in last year’s Australian federal election, after the Australian Broadcasting Corporation website, was <a href="http://larvatusprodeo.net/">Larvatus Prodeo</a>, a group blog of academics and commentators.</p>

<p>Sam Roggeveen of the<a href="http://www.lowyinstitute.org/"> Lowy Institute</a> discussed the Institute's blogging activities. Sam wrote on their blog, <a href="http://www.lowyinterpreter.org/">The Interpreter</a>, how blueprints had been <a href="http://www.lowyinterpreter.org/post/2008/01/Australia's-role-in-China's-naval-expansion.aspx">sold by an Australian company to the Chinese Navy</a>. While this was not news in that this had already been published in specialist defence journals, putting it on the blog resulted in  mainstream media coverage for the story. </p>

<p>Sam believes that Australian political blogging is not mature, and is behind that of other modern economies. The Lowy Institute has, for now, chosen not to enable comments on the blog, primarily because of the risk of defamation. </p>

<p>Kylie Johnson of the federal science research agency <a href="http://www.csiro.au/">CSIRO </a>"had a go",  plunged in, and has implemented some very interesting initiatives. Coming from a broadcast background, she decided to build a simple studio and do podcasts. Initially management didn't want to do it, but a leaked audio file became very popular, making it a fait accompli. For over a month the CSIRO podcasts were the #1 Australian science show on iTunes, beating out very popular science shows on mainstream radio programs. CSIRO is now creating foreign language podcasts, including in Mandarin.</p>

<p>Another success was a video of a scientist who had created an air guitar, which CSIRO recreated and released on YouTube (see below). In addition to being a big success on YouTube, it was covered by  BBC, CBC, CBS, Guardian, and was the seventh most viewed story on Yahoo!  that day.</p>

<p><object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/uwvKGJXvHZA&hl=en"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/uwvKGJXvHZA&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object></p>

<p>Steven Lewis has fairly recently joined the innovation team at AMP. He blogs internally and externally. Steven does the internal comms for Lee Barnett, the head of IT@AMP, and has turned her internal email communications into a blog. After initially languishing, the blog took off when they did an April Fool post saying that as their performance agreement everyone would have to lose weight, post their current weight on a wiki, and clock in and out to the gym. What happened once the blog took off is that staff started using the blog to communicate internally, to topics ranging as far as where to catch up for lunch. Lee started making more personal posts, now dividing her communication between formal communication on email and more informal communication on her internal blog.</p>

<p>Another initiative supported the move of AMP’s Melbourne office, which some staff found out about in the national business newspaper. A blog was used to communicate news about the office move, while a wiki was created so staff could share where to eat, how to use public transport to get to the new office, and other useful tips.</p>

<p>In one case there was an inappropriate comment on Lee’s blog. The HR Director and CIO went to Steven to tell him he needed to delete the comment. Steven suggested instead responding with other comments, which the senior executives did. Others chipped in, and the original commenter ended up retracting their comment. As a result the exchange was far more constructive than if the comment had simply been deleted.</p>

<p>The final panel on online media brought up many reflections on last week’s <a href="http://www.thefutureofjournalism.org.au/">Future of Journalism conference</a> and is worth a separate post, which I’ll hopefully get up shortly.</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>To win in an open world Flash is becoming even more open – the result will be applications that reach every platform</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://rossdawsonblog.com/weblog/archives/2008/05/to_win_in_an_op.html" />
    <id>tag:rossdawsonblog.com,2008://9.1422</id>

    <published>2008-05-01T11:07:18Z</published>
    <updated>2008-05-01T11:42:16Z</updated>

    <summary>Adobe has just announced the Open Screen Project, a broad-based initiative to push Flash’s reach across all digital platforms, including mobile and television. Supporters include BBC, Cisco, Motorola, MTV, Nokia, Samsung, Sony Ericsson, and a host of other consumer technology,...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Ross Dawson</name>
        <uri>http://www.rossdawsonblog.com</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Technology trends" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Web 2.0" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://rossdawsonblog.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Adobe has just <a href="http://www.adobe.com/aboutadobe/pressroom/pressreleases/200804/050108AdobeOSP.html">announced the Open Screen Project</a>, a broad-based initiative to push Flash’s reach across all digital platforms, including mobile and television. Supporters include BBC, Cisco, Motorola, MTV, Nokia, Samsung, Sony Ericsson, and a host of other consumer technology, content, and mobile companies. </p>

<p>When <a href="http://www.livingnetworksbook.com/"><em>Living Networks</em></a> was launched in 2002, I wrote about how Macromedia (which has since been acquired by Adobe) used an open strategy to make Flash a standard in rich media on the web:</p>

<blockquote>Whenever you go to a website and are presented with a snazzy animated introduction, you are seeing Macromedia Flash at work. The free Flash Player software that enables people to view these animations is now running on around 97% of PCs that are connected to the Internet. At the outset, Macromedia had a clear-cut challenge. Web surfers would only download Flash Player if there were interesting websites using Flash, while website designers  would only use Flash if a sufficient proportion of their target audience had installed the software.  Macromedia makes its money by selling the software for developers to create Flash files, but to make it a viable market it had to give away the Flash Player software.
</blockquote>]]>
        <![CDATA[<blockquote>Along the way, Macromedia made a bold decision. It published the specifications for the SWF files used by the Flash Player software, and committed to keeping these open. This meant that any other company could take advantage of the large installed base of Flash Player software, and sell software to compete directly with Macromedia’s Flash software, which was its only source of revenue from the exercise. Indeed, arch-rival Adobe rushed to market with a directly competitive product, based on the specifications made available by Macromedia. The reason Macromedia made Flash open is that it provided an immense impetus to make it a de facto standard for Internet multimedia. If it hadn’t released it, others would have come out with competitive formats, and Flash may never have broken through to become dominant. Macromedia may not have all the market for Internet multimedia design software, but having established the standard format clearly gives it a big headstart on all its competitors, and it has guaranteed a total market size almost as big as the Internet.</blockquote>

<p>[<a href="http://rossdawsonblog.com/weblog/archives/2008/04/living_networks_2.html">Free download of Chapter 2 of Living Networks</a>, where this is excerpted from.]</p>

<p>While an open approach was fundamental to Flash’s success, a substantial further degree of openness is required to take Flash’s success beyond the PC desktop to other Internet-enabled devices. </p>

<p>As <a href="http://venturebeat.com/2008/04/30/adobe-open-screen-project-opens-door-for-even-more-flash/">VentureBeat writes</a>, referring to Adobe’s Dave McAllister:</p>

<blockquote>For Flash, the real frontier isn’t the web, but mobile and other devices. Sure, the company says Flash and its mobile version Flash Lite have been installed on 500 million devices, and that number will increase to 1 billion sometime next year, but McAllister adds, “In terms of all devices that could connect into Internet, that’s not very big.”</blockquote>

<p>McAllister is particularly referring to mobile devices. However television and set-top boxes for TV are also key targets here.</p>

<p>Adobe’s recently launched AIR product can be thought of both as a multi-platform application and the next interface beyond the browser. Similarly, the Open Screen Project is perhaps more than anything a play for developers to be able to develop once, and provide their application across multiple platforms.</p>

<p>What this has required is opening up the SWF and FLV standards even further than I described in Living Networks. Now anyone can create derivative and competing applications based on these standards. In addition, as <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/30/adobes-open-screen-project-write-once-flash-everywhere/">noted by Techcrunch</a>, Adobe is forgoing $52 million in revenues by removing licensing fees for Flash on mobile. Also there are now no costs or restrictions on porting Flash to new devices.</p>

<p>In short, Macromedia’s (at the time) openness helped to establish Flash as a standard on the desktop. Today, as the <a href="http://rossdawsonblog.com/weblog/archives/2008/04/the_next_phase_1.html">trend to openness</a> has gone further, greater openness is required to help Flash predominate across the multiple platforms of the connected world of today. </p>

<p>The final result of this is that developers are likely to be able to develop in one platform, and reach all web-enabled devices. As with many of these initiaitives, the winner is the consumer. More development of great tools, more potential to use them, more applications that link everything that is connected to the web. </p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>After Web 2.0: WOW (Wide Open Web) - enough of version numbers for the web!!</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://rossdawsonblog.com/weblog/archives/2008/04/after_web_20_wo.html" />
    <id>tag:rossdawsonblog.com,2008://9.1420</id>

    <published>2008-04-26T22:53:11Z</published>
    <updated>2008-04-26T22:59:48Z</updated>

    <summary>In the wake of the 2008 Web 2.0 expo, now 3½ years since the first Web 2.0 conference in 2004, it seems getting time to work out what will succeed Web 2.0. I always thought that Web 2.0 was a...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Ross Dawson</name>
        <uri>http://www.rossdawsonblog.com</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Web 2.0" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="web20" label="web 2.0" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="web25" label="web 2.5" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="web30" label="web 3.0" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://rossdawsonblog.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>In the wake of the 2008 Web 2.0 expo, now 3½ years since the first Web 2.0 conference in 2004, it seems getting time to work out what will succeed Web 2.0. I always thought that Web 2.0 was a useful and meaningful term, and created my <a href="http://www.rossdawsonblog.com/weblog/archives/2007/05/launching_the_w.html">Web 2.0 Framework</a> to help unpack and communicate what it is. The term helped people to understand the nature of the shift from Web as communication to Web as participation. </p>

<p>I’ve also long thought that <a href="http://www.rossdawsonblog.com/weblog/archives/2007/10/why_web_30_is_a.html">Web 3.0 is a meaningless term</a>. It means whatever people want it to mean. While we have reached a reasonably common understanding of what Web 2.0 is (though I’m sure others will disagree), I don’t think it’s possible that any consensus will emerge on what Web 3.0 is, making its use a destroyer rather than enabler of communication. The one element that people always associate with Web 3.0 is the semantic web, which has been a very long time coming, and will still be a very long time coming. It’s a tremendous, laudable goal which is still going to take far longer than most people seem to think, so it’s not something we should be talking about in the present. Anyway, the semantic web already has a term to describe it, and it is well defined, so why do we need to use a new term to refer it?</p>

<p>I’ve been a long time student of how business and technology terms are born, brought into widespread usage, debased, and die. I don’t believe that Web 3.0 will be a term that be useful or used. Charles Cooper <a href="http://www.news.com/8301-10787_3-9929415-60.html?tag=blogFeed">has just tried to define Web 2.5</a>, which is even worse – yes I agree with him that it’s about time to dump Web 2.0, but the answer is NOT Web 2.5! However we absolutely need new terms to describe where the web is going and what it means.</p>

<p>In my <a href="http://rossdawsonblog.com/weblog/archives/2008/04/the_next_phase_1.html">recent post on openness in the Internet</a> I used the term Wide Open Web (WOW). On consideration I think this is a fair suggestion to describe the current and next stage of the web. There are undoubtedly many other possibilities, and I think it’s time for the proposals to come out, so the most relevant and useful term comes into usage, rather than terms such as Web 2.5, that are even more meaningless than Web 3.0, and don’t help anyone understand what is going on.</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>One of the primary considerations for a useful term is that it communicates effectively to non-technical people what is happening. Web 2.0 was brought into widespread usage as much in communication through mass media as it was among the geeks creating it. Any new term has to have explanatory power, to elucidate rather than obfuscate.</p>

<p>Of course one of the core characteristics of Web 2.0 is openness, so what is different about the Wide Open Web? Critically, the fact that it is here now, and the tenor of the Web 2.0 expo was absolutely and completely about completely open platforms. That is now a given. </p>

<p>The question is what we now do with the <a href="http://rossdawsonblog.com/weblog/archives/2008/04/the_next_phase_1.html">Wide Open Web</a>. It is critically important that the broad community, and not just technologists, understand quite how open the web has become, what it implies, and the opportunities that will emerge. Certainly one of the key implications is that initiatives such as <a href="http://dataportability.org/">DataPortability </a>are fundamentally important to enabling the power of WOW.</p>

<p>I’ll think a little more about what the Wide Open Web actually means. For now a first rather clunky attempt at a definition.</p>

<blockquote>Wide Open Web (WOW) is the Internet based on open applications, open data, open access, creating value from the reuse and recombination of all its elements, with users controlling all their data. </blockquote>

<p>Of course the suggestion of WOW is as much as anything an attempt to get some other possibilities for what succeeds Web 2.0. Anything is better than Web 2.5 or Web 3.0!!</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Living Networks - Chapter 2: Emerging Technologies – Free Download and Commentary</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://rossdawsonblog.com/weblog/archives/2008/04/living_networks_2.html" />
    <id>tag:rossdawsonblog.com,2008://9.1419</id>

    <published>2008-04-25T05:19:49Z</published>
    <updated>2008-04-27T05:22:49Z</updated>

    <summary>Download Chapter 2 of Living Networks on Emerging Technologies Every chapter of Living Networks is being released on this blog as a free download, together with commentary and updated perspectives since its original publication in 2002. For the full Table...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Ross Dawson</name>
        <uri>http://www.rossdawsonblog.com</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Living Networks book" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://rossdawsonblog.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.rossdawsonblog.com/LivingNetworks_Chapter2.pdf"><strong>Download Chapter 2 of <em>Living Networks</em> on Emerging Technologies</strong></a></p>

<p>Every chapter of <em><a href="http://www.livingnetworksbook.com/">Living Networks</a></em> is being released on this blog as a free download, together with commentary and updated perspectives since its original publication in 2002. </p>

<p>For the <a href="http://livingnetworksbook.com/downloads.php">full Table of Contents and free chapter downloads</a> see the <a href="http://livingnetworksbook.com/"><em>Living Networks</em> website</a> or the <a href="http://rossdawsonblog.com/weblog/archives/2008/04/launch_of_livin.html">Book Launch/ Preface to the Anniversary Edition</a>.</p>

<p><br />
<strong><em><a href="http://www.rossdawsonblog.com/LivingNetworks_Chapter2.pdf">Living Networks - Chapter 2: Emerging Technologies</a></em> <br />
How Standards and Integration Are Driving Business Strategy</strong></p>

<p><em><strong>OVERVIEW</strong>: Standards are the foundation of communication, and of all networks. Building on the existing foundation of powerful standards and connectivity, there are three sets of emerging technologies that are driving the next stage of the networks: XML and web services; peer-to-peer; and network interfaces. In the connected economy, standards and network strategy are at the heart of all business.</em></p>

<p><br />
<strong>Chapter 2 of <em>Living Networks</em> - Commentary and updated perspectives</strong></p>

<p>It would seem likely that a chapter written in 2002 about emerging technologies would date very quickly. However the emphasis of this chapter was on standards and integration, which have absolutely been at the foundation of technological change over the last five years, and continue to be firmly at the center of what dominates technology today.</p>

<p><img src="http://rossdawsonblog.com/LN_Figure2_3.jpg"><br />
<strong>The (very) gradual shift to open, accepted standards</strong> (see below in the text for explanation)</p>

<p>I selected three sets of emerging technologies to focus on in this chapter: XML and web services, Peer-to-peer networks, and Network interfaces.</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>Shortly after Living Networks was launched XML celebrated its fifth birthday, and it has now reached the august age of ten. While XML is still not highly visible other than to software developers, and other data interchange formats have arisen, it still provides the core foundation of the networked world of today. AJAX, a key foundation of <a href="http://www.rossdawsonblog.com/weblog/archives/2007/05/launching_the_w.html">Web 2.0 technologies</a>, stands for Asynchronous Javascript and XML, using the underlying technology in new ways. Talk of ‘web services’ has shifted to Service Oriented Architecture, but the concept remains the same. </p>

<p>There has been less talk about peer-to-peer networks today than five years ago, but the concept underlies how the Internet is evolving. The five domains for peer-to-peer domains I described remain totally relevant: Distributed content, Distributed computation, Collaboration, Distributed processes, and Markets. My definition of Web 2.0 is “distributed technologies, built to integrate, that collectively transform mass participation into valuable emergent outcomes.” The value of what the Internet has become today is that it is almost fully decentralized. <a href="http://rossdawsonblog.com/weblog/archives/2008/04/the_next_phase_1.html">Technologies are distributed</a>, with single applications rarely trying to do everything required on their own. They are built to integrate, to draw on other applications, and often to be available to other applications, forming a peer-level network of data and applications. </p>

<p>What I called ‘the interfaces that merge people and technology’ are still fundamental to our future. I have more recently <a href="http://rossdawsonblog.com/weblog/archives/2007/09/six_trends_that.html">spoken </a>and <a href="http://rossdawsonblog.com/weblog/archives/2008/01/predictions_for_1.html">being interviewed</a> about the current state of our interfaces with technology and the potential they hold. Despite the rise of voice recognition and <a href="http://www.rossdawsonblog.com/weblog/archives/2006/05/video_goggles_w.html">video glasses</a>, we are far from transcending clunky keyboards, and the true merging of humans and machines is yet to happen.</p>

<p>When we launched Living Networks, the idea that most captured the imagination of the media was ‘<a href="http://rossdawsonblog.com/weblog/archives/2003/02/proximity_datin.html">proximity dating</a>’, leading to interviews on national breakfast television and substantial newspaper coverage. While I have been <a href="http://rossdawsonblog.com/weblog/archives/2006/08/what_accelerate.html">interviewed many times</a> about <a href="http://rossdawsonblog.com/weblog/archives/2007/01/interview_on_mo.html">mobile social networks</a> over the last five years, their prime time is yet to come. However the next year or two is likely to see broad adoption, as <a href="http://rossdawsonblog.com/weblog/archives/2008/04/mobile_social_n.html">social networks transcend computers</a> and shift to mobile devices.</p>

<p>The final section of the chapter is on Standards and Network Strategy. While business strategists now often implicitly understand these concepts, <a href="http://rossdawsonblog.com/weblog/archives/2007/02/search_is_the_i.html">standards strategy is rarely fully thought through</a> by major organizations. </p>

<p>The diagram at the beginning of this post illustrates the shift to open, accepted standards. In the chapter I wrote:</p>

<blockquote><em>Since the trend to open, accepted standards is clear, it is far better to go with it rather than fight it. Long-term success must be based on aligning yourself with these shifts. Over time, the greatest rewards will go to those who provide effective leadership towards standards, while implementing clear
strategies on how they are positioned and create value within the unfolding landscape.</em></blockquote>

<p>The shifts in attitude of Microsoft, IBM, Google, and others demonstrate that this position is now pretty well accepted. Strategy needs to unfold within this playing space. </p>

<p>The examples I used in my four action steps for developing network strategies included Flash, the Amex Blue card, instant messaging interoperability, Bluetooth, FXall and the Xbox. There are any number of new case studies that could be used, with HD and HD disk standards among the most visible. I think a useful addition to the literature over the last years has been <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Slow-Pace-Fast-Change-Innovations/dp/157851780X/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1209101074&sr=1-1">The Slow Pace of Fast Change</a> by Chakravorti, which examines how game theory can be applied to standards strategy, however the fundamentals transcend any specific technology or epoch.</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>The next phase of the Internet will be about creating value from the WOW (Wide Open Web)</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://rossdawsonblog.com/weblog/archives/2008/04/the_next_phase_1.html" />
    <id>tag:rossdawsonblog.com,2008://9.1416</id>

    <published>2008-04-24T11:19:49Z</published>
    <updated>2008-04-24T11:28:24Z</updated>

    <summary>So far the primary theme of the Web 2.0 Expo in San Francisco seems to be openness and APIs (Application Programming Interfaces), which I defined in our Web 2.0 Framework as “A defined interface to a computer application or database...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Ross Dawson</name>
        <uri>http://www.rossdawsonblog.com</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Technology trends" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Web 2.0" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://rossdawsonblog.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>So far the primary theme of the <a href="http://www.web2expo.com/">Web 2.0 Expo</a> in San Francisco seems to be openness and APIs (Application Programming Interfaces), which I defined in our <a href="http://www.rossdawsonblog.com/weblog/archives/2007/05/launching_the_w.html">Web 2.0 Framework</a> as “A defined interface to a computer application or database that allows access by other applications.” Web companies new and old are announcing APIs that provide access to the data that resides on their site.</p>

<p>ReadWriteWeb writes about the <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/after_apis.php">next frontier after ubiquitous APIs</a>, an <a href="http://venturebeat.com/2008/04/23/qa-with-max-levchin-of-slide-on-e-commerce-apis-feeds-and-a-russian-rock-band/">interview of Web 2.0 keynoter Max Levchin</a> focuses on the implications of APIs on every application, and <a href="http://www.news.com/8301-13953_3-9927418-80.html">Tim O’Reilly in his keynote says that</a> the paradox is that applications built on open, decentralized networks are leading to new concentrations of power.</p>

<p>In the last weeks I’ve been looking across what is available on APIs, and it is quite extraordinary. Driven significantly by the impetus of Google’s leadership, over the last couple of years the industry has taken a <a href="http://rossdawsonblog.com/weblog/archives/2007/08/is_the_trend_to.html">massive turn towards openness</a>, making it hard to run online initiatives any other way. </p>

<p>I am finding myself completely staggered by the possibilities. There are so many ways that this vast trove of information can be used in new and innovative applications. ReadWriteWeb's article provides a list of the ways APIs can be used. Some of the promising areas I see include:</p>

<p><strong>Content aggregation</strong>. Despite the existing proliferation of blog and feed aggregators, there are many more opportunities to create highly specialized content aggregators, bringing together the web’s most relevant content in niche domains.</p>

<p><strong>Collaborative filtering</strong>. The richness of information about people’s content preferences available from something like FriendFeed (or the individual feeds that go into it) make it possible to correlate taste across media and genres.</p>

<p><strong>Latent social networks</strong>: Suggesting friends or connections based not just on profile or musical tastes, but an integrated view of preferences and activities. This could be particularly powerful in dating. </p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>In short, the web is now laid almost entirely open. The tools to gather and bring together the information available across the web are readily available. Now, more than at any time in history, good ideas are the primary currency. When any idea can be easily implemented with almost no constraints, the quality of the idea wins. There will be no shortage of ideas on what to do with the Wide Open Web (WOW). As I wrote in <a href="http://rossdawsonblog.com/weblog/archives/2008/04/living_networks_1.html">Chapter 1</a> of <a href="http://www.livingnetworksbook.com/">Living Networks</a> (just <a href="http://rossdawsonblog.com/weblog/archives/2008/04/launch_of_livin.html">relaunched in an Anniversary Edition</a>), in discussing the sexual life of ideas:</p>

<blockquote><em>Ideas don't like being alone. In fact they like copulating promiscuously with any other idea in sight. There is no such thing as a virgin birth in the world of ideas. Ideas are always born from other ideas: interacting, mating, and procreating. This often orgiastic coupling takes place in the fertile substrate which is the human mind. Our minds are hotbeds of unspeakable activities—ideas have a life of their own, but they need somewhere to carry on their flirtations and breeding.</em></blockquote>

<p>Today the substrate in which ideas procreate is the web, enabled by the recent massive shift to openness. It is mind boggling to even try to imagine what will be born out of this potential for innovation. The next phase of the web will be driven by how we take advantage of the extraordinary world of the Wide Open Web.</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Keynote at Tandberg Summit: weaving together Enterprise 2.0 and videoconferencing</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://rossdawsonblog.com/weblog/archives/2008/04/keynote_at_tand.html" />
    <id>tag:rossdawsonblog.com,2008://9.1415</id>

    <published>2008-04-23T01:04:27Z</published>
    <updated>2008-04-23T01:12:55Z</updated>

    <summary>I recently did the opening keynote on The Future of Business at the Tandberg Summit 2008, which brings together the clients, distributors and partners of the global videoconferencing firm, and stayed for most of the first day. I found it...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Ross Dawson</name>
        <uri>http://www.rossdawsonblog.com</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Collaboration" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Enterprise 2.0" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="enterprise20" label="enterprise 2.0" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="tandberg" label="tandberg" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="video" label="video" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://rossdawsonblog.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>I recently did the opening keynote on The Future of Business at the Tandberg Summit 2008, which brings together the clients, distributors and partners of the global videoconferencing firm, and stayed for most of the first day. I found it extremely interesting being among a large people who were concerned with implementing video in organizations, as these are almost entirely different people to those concerned with Enterprise 2.0 approaches, though their objectives and issues are very similar. More thoughts on that in a moment. It’s probably worth setting the scene with a review of the conference by CRN Magazine, titled <a href="http://www.crn.com.au/Feature/4386,tandberg-summit-2008-video-killed-the-radio-star.aspx">Tandberg Summit 2008: Video killed the radio star</a>. The entire article is worth a read – I’ve excerpted below the section covering my presentation:</p>

<blockquote>A highlight of the conference was a keynote by Ross Dawson, chairman of Future Exploration Network, who provided insight into the dynamics within an organisation and the video communications market. Referring to internal business practices, Dawson stressed the importance of collaboration between employees and identifying personal qualities that may help foster growth.</blockquote>]]>
        <![CDATA[<blockquote>“You need to be aware of individuals who are highly competent, people you can draw on who offer something that is useful to you. You also need to be visible yourself,” he explained. “Those who have more diverse personal networks are more successful.”

<p>Dawson then took a thoughtful look at ‘energy’ projected by individuals that can influence the productivity of an organisation – and you would have been forgiven for confusing the keynote for a New Age motivational seminar. </p>

<p>“When you think about an organisation as a network, there are some people who are energisers, out of which energy flows in all directions. Then there are people who are de-energisers, the black holes who suck all the energy out of everybody they touch,” he explained. “Energisers are collaborative, they want to work with others and want to get the best job done and these are the things we need to consider when we bring people on board.”</p>

<p>To simplify his philosophical musings, Dawson listed a few key actions organisations can adopt to facilitate collaboration, which he linked to Tandberg technology.</p>

<p>“Make it easy for organisations to engage, video conferencing is absolutely a really important part of that, it’s the foundation. Also being able to collaborate, work together and build relationships makes it easy for people to make connections.”</p>

<p>Dawson went on to speak more generally about the economy and how the current unstructured climate is mimicked within organisations. Using Web 2.0 to illustrate his point, he provided the analogy of Wikipedia and its predecessor Nupedia. The structured nature of Nupedia, which provided a methodical means of contributing content, resulted in the platform’s demise whereas Wikipedia has thrived based on a more unstructured framework, he stated.</p>

<p>“By not being so structured, this extraordinary thing developed,” he said, referring to Wikipedia. “Those organisations sticking to a very dogmatic structure are clearly failing. More and more we’re going to see the difference between those organisations where executives understand that to be able to grow and develop and be successful in an unstructured world you can’t control things, a structure will emerge on its own.”</p>

<p>Dawson’s central message combined his initial discussion surrounding collaboration with the importance of embracing an unstructured methodology to add more value. However, he cautioned that to determine the degree to which a Web 2.0 collaborative environment is beneficial or harmful to a business is dependent on its skills base and culture.</p>

<p>“We need to redefine an organisation’s boundaries. In a modular economy you can start to become more innovative,” he said. “However, the infinite players play with boundaries and it’s not just the boundaries within an organisation but how will we draw on our strengths to move into new areas and new domains.”</p>

<p>According to Dawson, Tandberg video conferencing offerings are designed to help organisations fulfill these aims by providing tools that will bolster productivity in an unrestrictive way.</p>

<p>“[Through video conferencing] they are able to extend their senses, extend their reach and build stronger relationships while still being highly efficient,” he said.</blockquote></p>

<p>The essential perspective I was presenting was that of <a href="http://rossdawsonblog.com/weblog/archives/2008/04/keynote_buildin.html">the networked organization</a>, in which <a href="http://rossdawsonblog.com/weblog/archives/2007/12/erp_automating.html">being more effective at ad-hoc communication and collaboration</a> underpins organizational performance. It was in fact one of the audiences the most attuned to these messages that I have encountered, and my presentation got a fantastic response. </p>

<p>What I found intriguing is the mixture of technical and cultural disciplines in the room. While there were many people concerned with the mechanics of setting up video across large, geographically distributed organizations, there were many who were trying to get people to use the video. It turns out that people don’t necessarily come when the videoconferencing facilities are there. </p>

<p>One consultant who was working in a large bank told the story of how they set up video terminals in glass meeting rooms, and made the company video directory come up immediately when people came in to have a look. People went in, poked at the terminal, then pulled out their mobile phones to call colleagues in other offices so they could try it out. However many senior executives express doubt over the value of videoconferencing, and sometimes try to actively impede uptake. </p>

<p>A key dynamic in the videoconferencing industry is competition from free video calling, notably on Skype. That notwithstanding, the industry is growing extremely rapidly, illustrated by Tandberg’s <a href="http://www.norway.org/business/businessnews/TANDBERG.htm">recent 50% year-on-year revenue growth</a>, and the success of more recent entrants into the market such as Cisco and HP’s telepresence offerings. The conclusion I came to is that there is a real difference in enterprise-grade applications, including in videoconferencing, and that for many companies the cost of installing dedicated video infrastructure and facilties is absolutely worthwhile. However the competition for free will definitely intensify in coming years, requiring new forms of value-add.</p>

<p>I’ve done a fair bit with videoconferencing myself, including running the world’s first cross-continental panels over video at our <a href="http://www.futureexploration.net/fom06/">Future of Media Summit 2006</a>, which was held simultaneously in Sydney and San Francisco. However I’m now energized to do a lot more, including more consulting and speaking over video. I’ll report back as I experiment more with video, and in particular see how Enterprise 2.0 and video can be merged to help transform how organizations work. </p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Living Networks - Chapter 1: The Networks Come Alive – Free Download and Commentary</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://rossdawsonblog.com/weblog/archives/2008/04/living_networks_1.html" />
    <id>tag:rossdawsonblog.com,2008://9.1414</id>

    <published>2008-04-22T11:53:26Z</published>
    <updated>2008-04-27T05:21:14Z</updated>

    <summary>Download Chapter 1 of Living Networks: The Networks Come Alive Every chapter of Living Networks is being released on this blog as a free download, together with commentary and updated perspectives since its original publication in 2002. For the full...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Ross Dawson</name>
        <uri>http://www.rossdawsonblog.com</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Living Networks book" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://rossdawsonblog.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.rossdawsonblog.com/LivingNetworks_Chapter1.pdf"><strong>Download Chapter 1 of <em>Living Networks</em>: The Networks Come Alive</strong></a></p>

<p>Every chapter of <em><a href="http://www.livingnetworksbook.com/">Living Networks</a></em> is being released on this blog as a free download, together with commentary and updated perspectives since its original publication in 2002. </p>

<p>For the <a href="http://livingnetworksbook.com/downloads.php">full Table of Contents and free chapter downloads</a> see the <a href="http://livingnetworksbook.com/"><em>Living Networks</em> website</a> or the <a href="http://rossdawsonblog.com/weblog/archives/2008/04/launch_of_livin.html">Book Launch/ Preface to the Anniversary Edition</a>.</p>

<p><br />
<strong><em><a href="http://www.rossdawsonblog.com/LivingNetworks_Chapter1.pdf">Living Networks - Chapter 1: The Networks Come Alive</a></em> <br />
What the Changing Flow of Information and Ideas Means for Business</strong></p>

<p><em><strong>OVERVIEW</strong>: Connectivity is shrinking our world, and in the process transforming business. As communication between people becomes more fluid and pervasive, it is creating what looks like a global brain, in which ideas procreate freely and we collaborate to filter an ever-expanding universe of information. But just a small proportion of the planet’s population is connected. It is critical that we extend participation as broadly as we can.</em></p>

<p><br />
<strong>Chapter 1 of <em>Living Networks</em> - Commentary and updated perspectives </strong></p>

<p>As for almost all the book, the underlying messages in Chapter 1 are as relevant today as they were over five years ago. The five key issues outlined at the outset: collaboration with clients and partners; organizational performance; innovation and intellectual property; strategy and positioning; and individual leadership are still today the most relevant issues for business in our extraordinarily networked world.</p>

<p>The opening words of Living Networks were “Macromedia, the company best known for Flash software, is blogging.” In 2002 companies were already using blogs to communicate more effectively with their customers. After the launch of the book, in my speeches I used the story of how this initial foray into blogging evolved, with Macromedia (since bought by Adobe) aggregating now almost 2000 approved blogs, including those of its staff, partners, and customers. This entire community spanning inside and outside the organization is engaged in a conversation on how to use the software tools, bugs, fixes, and useful approaches.</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>In the second paragraph of the book I wrote about how instant messaging was being taken up by bond traders. Over the last years I’ve gone a lot deeper into how the financial services community is using new collaboration technologies, including real-time communication in trading and markets, and collaborative spaces in deal-making such as M&A. I ran the Collaboration in Financial Services conference in New York in 2004 and in London in 2005, and wrote a white paper on How Collaborative Technologies are Transforming Financial Services. Today, the best of the financial services sector is in the lead in applying Enterprise 2.0 approaches to building effective collaboration and communication inside organizations.</p>

<p>Early in the chapter I used an example of how I had made and met a friend on another continent though online forums. Today the soaring growth of social networks means these kinds of encounters are happening far more frequently. However the principles remain the same, especially in how digital connections often migrate to face-to-face relationships.</p>

<p>I then introduced the idea of “micro-messages,” illustrated with the example of SMS and instant messaging. This has certainly come a long way further, with today Twitter, Jaiku, Seesmic, and many other tools being used extensively for almost constant communication between the connected. In fact the term “micro-blogging” is now often used to refer to these services. </p>

<p>What I described as “the sexual life of ideas” has become a meme in its own right, with many people taking the concept and using it in new ways. </p>

<p>I have believed deeply since the mid-1990s in collaborative filtering. Iin Living Networks I went so far as to head the section on the topic “Collaborative Filtering Saves Humanity!” Today we can still understand much of Web 2.0 in these terms, as reflected in my Web 2.0 framework and other blog posts. In the book I used the example of Slashdot, which can be seen today as the forerunner of a host of similar sites such as Digg, Netscape, and Reddit that are becoming central to how people find and consume news. One of my phrases expresses what I have consistently communicated over the last years:</p>

<p>The highly interlinked nature of weblogs means that they are in themselves a powerful form of collaborative filtering. What is most interesting and worthwhile quickly becomes most visible.</p>

<p>The concept of ‘We, the media’ has come a long way since I wrote about it in 2002, with a book by that title coming out two years later, and a massive rise in what I already described then as ‘participatory media’. Our Future of Media Report 2006 contained a strategic framework that has been downloaded well over 100,000 times now, drawing on the original ideas by depicting the symbiosis of mainstream and social media. </p>

<p>The issues raised in the final section of Chapter 1, on the limits of the networks, are more current than ever. As value shifts to the connected world of the ‘flow economy’, there is an increasing risk that the gap between the haves and have nots will widen, based on whether or not people have access to the networked world. Initiatives such as One Laptop Per Child and Grameen Phone’s initiatives, that I wrote about in Chapter 1, are certainly helping. However there is far more to be done in ensuring as much as possible of the world’s population has the access and education to participate and truly benefit from the wonders of the living networks. </p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Launch of Living Networks - Anniversary Edition! Free download of entire book</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://rossdawsonblog.com/weblog/archives/2008/04/launch_of_livin.html" />
    <id>tag:rossdawsonblog.com,2008://9.1413</id>

    <published>2008-04-22T11:42:05Z</published>
    <updated>2008-04-22T12:40:56Z</updated>

    <summary>Living Networks has just been relaunched in an Anniversary Edition, to mark five years since its original publication by Financial Times/ Prentice Hall in November 2002. Other than slightly dated case studies and examples, I believe almost every aspect of...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Ross Dawson</name>
        <uri>http://www.rossdawsonblog.com</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Living Networks book" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://rossdawsonblog.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://livingnetworksbook.com/"><em>Living Networks</em></a> has just been relaunched in an Anniversary Edition, to mark five years since its original publication by Financial Times/ Prentice Hall in November 2002. Other than slightly dated case studies and examples, I believe almost every aspect of the book is current and highly relevant today. Revisiting the foundations of our networked age is enormously relevant today, as the last five years have in fact largely realized what I originally wrote in <em>Living Networks</em>. </p>

<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image"><img alt="LN_AE_cover_200x132.jpg" src="http://rossdawsonblog.com/LN_AE_cover_200x132.jpg" width="132" height="200" class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; margin: 0 20px 20px 0;"/></span>

<p>The book is available for purchase <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Living-Networks-Anniversary-Customers-Hyper-Connected/dp/1847995608?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1207864769&sr=1-4">on Amazon.com</a> and <a href="http://livingnetworksbook.com/buy.php">other major booksellers</a>. In addition every chapter of the book will be available <a href="http://livingnetworksbook.com/downloads.php">for free download </a>from this blog and the <a href="http://livingnetworksbook.com/">Living Networks book website</a>. Over the next weeks I will serialize the chapters on this blog, with commentary and updates for each chapter with the benefits of over five years of hindsight. So just come back to the blog or Living Networks website regularly or <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/TrendsInTheLivingNetworks">subscribe on your RSS reader</a>. Below is the table of contents and Preface to the Anniversary Edition, which describes in more detail the background to the relaunch. </p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>Since writing the preface, and having re-read the book in more detail, I find myself startled by how contemporary it is. In a way I think much of the book could in fact be more relevant and useful than it was in 2002, now that our networked world has been truly born and begins to mature. </p>

<p><br />
<strong>Living Networks - Table Of Contents</strong></p>

<p><strong><em>Preface to the Anniversary Edition</em><br />
<a href="http://rossdawsonblog.com/weblog/archives/2008/04/living_networks_1.html">Chapter 1 - The Networks Come Alive: What the Changing Flow of Information and Ideas Means For Business</a><br />
Chapter 2 - Emerging Technologies: How Standards and Integration Are Driving Business Strategy<br />
Chapter 3 - The New Organization: Leadership Across Blurring Boundaries<br />
Chapter 4 - Relationship Rules: Building Trust and Attention in the Tangled Web<br />
Chapter 5 - Distributed Innovation: Intellectual Property in a Collaborative World<br />
Chapter 6 - Network Presence: Harnessing the Flow of Marketing, Customer Feedback, and Knowledge<br />
Chapter 7 - The Flow Economy: Opportunities and Risks in the New Convergence<br />
Chapter 8 - Next Generation Content Distribution: Creating Value When Digital Products Flow Freely<br />
Chapter 9 - The Flow of Services: Reframing Digital and Professional Services<br />
Chapter 10 - Liberating Individuals: Network Strategy for Free Agents<br />
Chapter 11 - Future Networks: The Evolution of Business</strong></p>

<p><br />
<strong>Preface to the Anniversary Edition </strong></p>

<p>It is fascinating to reflect on the five years that have passed since Living Networks was first published in November 2002. In many ways that was the dawning of the age of networks, though by then it hadn’t yet been widely recognized. In those days the idea that the networks were coming to life was a pretty radical idea. Today many people simply nod in immediate understanding at the concept of the living networks.</p>

<p>Soon after the publication of Living Networks, the emergence of Friendster, MySpace, LinkedIn, and Facebook – to name just a few among a vast proliferation of social networks –provided literally hundreds of millions of people across the planet with a direct, personal experience of the rise of a networked world.</p>

<p>The first words of Living Networks were about how companies were using blogs. Since I first came across blogs I have believed they were a transformative tool. Certainly the intervening years have borne that out, with now over 100 million blogs existing worldwide, and blogs now comprising over 20% of the 100 most popular online media sites. My own blog Trends in the Living Networks (rossdawsonblog.com), launched five years ago to accompany this book, has been central to the extremely pleasing growth of my companies.</p>

<p>Organizational network analysis, which I described in Chapter 6, has since become a mainstream business tool. The success of the University of Virginia’s Network Roundtable, a consortium of 100 leading organizations where I am now a research leader, has demonstrated the power of network approaches to improving performance across business and government.</p>

<p>Living Networks is founded on extensive examples and case studies of actual corporate practice. It's interesting to see that many of the stories I used are still very current. Some of the most prominent business books out in the last year, including Wikinomics, The Starfish and the Spider, and Open Business Models, have used many of the same case studies that I did five years earlier. Stories such as Canadian miner Goldcorp’s use of open source approaches, Collabnet, Innocentive, Procter & Gamble’s Connect & Develop program, and many others described in Living Networks are still viewed as cutting-edge examples years later. “We the Media,” a section title in Chapter 1 of Living Networks, was later used as the title for a book.</p>

<p>So why am I relaunching Living Networks now? In hindsight, the book came out before most people were ready for the message, and in the depths of the dot-com bust. As such, the book probably didn't get the attention it might have if it were released a year or two later. </p>

<p>Five years after it was first published, certainly some of the value of relaunching Living Networks is as an historical document, in seeing where things stood as the networks were being born. </p>

<p>In some ways the world has moved on substantially over the last five years. The rise of what is now called Web 2.0, assisted by new technologies including AJAX, has changed the nature of the Internet. The landscape of digital rights management has changed dramatically from the playing field of 2002. Software-based services have progressed substantially over the last five years. Word of mouth marketing has become an entire industry with its own assocation.</p>

<p>However much of what was covered in Living Networks is still at least as relevant today as five years ago. Standards strategy is shaping industry structure more than ever. The power of distributed innovation is even more compelling today, and still barely tapped by most corporations. In our hyper-connected economy, trust, relationships, and personalization only increase in importance. Participative strategy development is finally becoming a common approach to strategy and leadership. The free agent economy is becoming ever-more enabled by the living networks as years go by.</p>

<p>The flow economy framework for business strategy I proposed in Chapter 7 is if anything even more relevant and useful today than five years ago, as many of my clients have discovered. Most importantly, collaboration across boundaries is becoming increasingly critical to the future of business, making executives’ attitudes to this issue absolutely central to their success. </p>

<p>Two years ago I founded Future Exploration Network, what is now a global strategy and events company that helps organizations understand – and create – the long-term future of business. Much of my speaking and consulting work today is about the future of business.</p>

<p>Journalists love to find out what ‘futurists’ have predicted in the past so they can see how right – or wrong! – they were. In Chapter 11 of Living Networks I made 10 predictions for the future of business. Many of the predictions were long-term, so we can’t </p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Social networks in organizations: balancing risk, reward, and transparency</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://rossdawsonblog.com/weblog/archives/2008/04/social_networks_3.html" />
    <id>tag:rossdawsonblog.com,2008://9.1411</id>

    <published>2008-04-21T23:20:32Z</published>
    <updated>2008-04-21T23:31:01Z</updated>

    <summary>A rather popular topic these days is the risks to organizations of using social networks. An article in today’s Australian Financial Review examines the issue in detail, with an interview of me (excerpted below) hopefully balancing out the other opinions...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Ross Dawson</name>
        <uri>http://www.rossdawsonblog.com</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Enterprise 2.0" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://rossdawsonblog.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>A rather popular topic these days is the risks to organizations of using social networks. An article in today’s <a href="http://www.afr.com/home/">Australian Financial Review</a> examines the issue in detail, with an interview of me (excerpted below) hopefully balancing out the other opinions expressed in the article. Unfortunately the way I was quoted seemed to overemphasize my cautions relative to the benefits I discussed.</p>

<p>I am finding it very tiresome to continuously hear security consultants and vendors with big PR budgets go on endlessly about risks, without ever mentioning business benefits. This drone gets into executives’ heads, and as a result discussion of social networks – and many other potentially valuable business tools – focuses on risk and not benefit.</p>

<p>My <a href="http://www.rossdawsonblog.com/weblog/archives/2008/02/an_enterprise_2.html">Enterprise 2.0 Governance Framework</a> explicitly addresses risks, benefits, and actions. It is critical to acknowledge, understand, and minimize risk, but executives are equally culpable if they ignore business value as if they ignore risk. </p>

<p>In the interview with the journalist I basically said that transparency increases business value, however providing transparency must be done intelligently and strategically. The danger is that executives become frightened of the risks, so unintelligently don’t provide transparency, and thus negatively impact the company’s value. Effective business leaders understand that in a complex world business value requires a highly nuanced approach, rather than the black and white view of organizations that is so frequently peddled. Excerpts from the article are below:</p>

<blockquote>When one of Australia’s leading evangelists for Enterprise 2.0 acknowledges “there are some real dangers in an increasingly transparent world”, it’s worth listening.

<p>Ross Dawson, chairman of the Future Exploration Network, is a great fan of online collaboration and communication, but admits there are limits. While research has revealed “a positive impact on stock prices where there is more transparency”, he warns that companies which transparently reported their customers’ private information, for example, would quickly see the opposite effect on share prices.</blockquote></p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<blockquote>Dawson says it is important organisations understand both the risks and the value of transparency, and then put in place systems to manage both.

<p>“Clearly, if people want to deliberately steal information there are no fail-safe devices, but you can marke it harder. But then there is inadvertent information loss - where people chat on Facebook, for example, and create something that is visible outside the company.</p>

<p>“Organisations need to think far more explicitly about what information they want to protect, what information to share with trusted partners, and what to disseminate freely.” According to Dawson, once an organisation has identified these three tiers of information it can put in policies and systems to corral them. </p>

<p>He says that some organisations are already doing this – citing Westpac, which allows employees to use Facebook for collaboration and communication, but blocks access to some of the widgets in order to reduce the chance of information being too widely distributed. </blockquote></p>

<p>Last year I was quoted in CIO magazine on similar issues, and described in more detail the implications of this framework for information boundaries in <a href="http://rossdawsonblog.com/weblog/archives/2007/09/defining_inform.html">Defining information boundaries provides a fundamental platform for organizational strategy</a>.</p>

<p>Today’s article goes on to quote a ‘security consultant’ and security product vendor who unsurprisingly harp on about dire risks. This is worth putting into context from Forrester's recent report (<a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/enterprise_20_to_become_a_46_billion_industry.php">excerpted in ReadWriteWeb</a>) which predicts that companies will spend $2 billion on social networking tools by 2013.</p>

<p>Later in the story I am quoted as saying:</p>

<blockquote>People who use social networking tools indiscrimately certainly need to consider what information they put on public display, according to Ross Dawson. “Everyone needs to understand that anything online is visible for ever more.”</blockquote>

<p>This is pretty basic stuff now. I was recently quoted in the women’s magazine Madison on how we can expect <a href="http://rossdawsonblog.com/weblog/archives/2007/10/watch_out_the_i.html">the intimate details of our lives to be visible</a>. This is a reality. The key issue is education, so young and old understand this and act accordingly. However I think the message has already pretty much got through.</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>The joys of self-employment: 7 reasons to love being your own boss</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://rossdawsonblog.com/weblog/archives/2008/04/the_joys_of_sel.html" />
    <id>tag:rossdawsonblog.com,2008://9.1410</id>

    <published>2008-04-18T10:48:55Z</published>
    <updated>2008-04-18T10:57:04Z</updated>

    <summary>This is a significant marking point in my life. I have been self-employed for as long as I was employed, making it 12 years of each. From my first day of employment, I always knew that I would eventually work...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Ross Dawson</name>
        <uri>http://www.rossdawsonblog.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://rossdawsonblog.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>This is a significant marking point in my life. I have been self-employed for as long as I was employed, making it 12 years of each. From my first day of employment, I always knew that I would eventually work for myself. I was surprised that it took as long as it did to escape. In fact, when I was working in Tokyo for Thomson Financial in the early 1990s I had firm plans to resign and live in Hong Kong or Macau, working as a freelance journalist covering the region. Then a girlfriend and a series of promotions made me feel there was no rush to leave, and I ended up being transferred to London into a job as Global Director - Capital Markets. This gave me some great senior corporate experience that I would never have got if had gone solo earlier. However it didn't take too long to reach the point when I was ready to resign and throw myself out into the Big Wide World. The day after I finished at Thomson in April 1996 I boarded a flight to Rio de Janeiro as the first stop on six months travels through the Americas. I had thought that as I traveled I'd think about what sort of business I'd start. I didn't have time for that on my adventures, only seriously considering what I wanted to do once I arrived back in Sydney after six years overseas. </p>

<p>It was very tough going for a long time, particularly trying to build global work based out of Sydney, but the success of my books really made the difference, and just around now - after many years of hard slog - things are panning out the way I always envisioned. This suggests to me that they have a fair bit further to go yet - time will tell.</p>

<p>When I left work I was completely committed to working for myself and controlling my own destiny. From the beginning I didn't ever consider taking external capital, because I felt it would make me beholden to someone else. In the near future I will be looking for external capital for a new venture, but it's not one in which I will be a full-time executive. If I ever sell a company, I'm not going to with the company as part of the sale. When things were difficult for me in the early days, my worst nightmare was that I would have to get a job - that was something that I would do anything to avoid. </p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>When I launched out on my own, I was thinking of writing a book on the joys of self-employment - why everybody should do it. The reality is that for many people, employment gives them what they want, including predictability of income (until you get laid off), the ability to do what you're best at and not having to worry about other issues, and a consistent social environment.</p>

<p>But that's not for me, and not for many other people, whether or not they've recognized it yet. Here are just a few reasons I love working for myself:</p>

<p><strong>1. My life is completely free-form and open-ended. </strong>I can - and do - regularly wake up in the morning and decide to change what my business does and how I do it. If you are in a job - even if it's as CEO - there are constraints and job definitions to work within.</p>

<p><strong>2. I can be myself. </strong>My early experience of employment was trying hard to fit in to very particular corporate cultures. I later realized that it was not that I wasn't suited to corporate or adult society per se, but that there simply wasn't a fit between my personality and the companies I happened to be working in. </p>

<p><strong>3. I get the value I create. </strong>If I do things well, I get the rewards for that - be they financial or otherwise. A key part of the trade-off of being employed is that you will only get a small proportion of the value you create for the organization.</p>

<p><strong>4. I am ultimately far more secure than employees. </strong>While it's a risk to set up a business venture or work for yourself, ultimately there is far greater security than working for a company or even government. I can't be laid off, and while my income may vary, I can always make money. In addition the (potentially) greater rewards from self-employment provide a solid buffer.</p>

<p><strong>5. I control my life</strong>. I choose where I live rather than living where I happen to find the right job, I sleep in, go to the beach during the day, work harder sometimes and slack off at others – all at my will and not having to ask for permission. </p>

<p><strong>6. I am the only one that needs to believe in me</strong>. What I do and where I get to is not dependent on someone else recognizing my capabilities. While I did pretty well in my ‘corporate’ career, I don’t think anyone I reported to ever saw what I was truly capable of (something I am sure many people will have experienced), so I would have been limited by others’ perceptions.</p>

<p><strong>7.  I work to create results, not to impress others. </strong>The majority of employed people of all levels of seniority play political games, striving to be seen or to be liked by the right people, working in environments where perceptions very often trump capability and outcomes.</p>

<p>There are many more reasons. I’ll probably add to this list later – additions welcome!</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Is one web ratings black box better than another black box? Why should we believe Alexa is better?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://rossdawsonblog.com/weblog/archives/2008/04/is_one_web_rati.html" />
    <id>tag:rossdawsonblog.com,2008://9.1409</id>

    <published>2008-04-17T01:58:52Z</published>
    <updated>2008-04-17T02:12:14Z</updated>

    <summary>Alexa, the Amazon.com subsidiarywhich provides website traffic and rankings information, has just announced it has revamped its rankings system. Since I have the Alexa toolbar installed in my browser, which shows the ranking of whichever website you’re currently looking at,...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Ross Dawson</name>
        <uri>http://www.rossdawsonblog.com</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Technology trends" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://rossdawsonblog.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alexa.com/">Alexa</a>, the Amazon.com subsidiarywhich provides website traffic and rankings information, has just <a href="http://www.alexa.com/site/company/announcement">announced it has revamped its rankings system</a>. Since I have the Alexa toolbar installed in my browser, which shows the ranking of whichever website you’re currently looking at, I actually noticed this morning that the rankings were changing. <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/16/alexa-overhauls-ranking-system/">Techcrunch reports</a> that the change has downrated many technology blogs. It has actually increased the ranking for this blog by about one third. </p>

<p>However the announcement gives absolutely no information on how the ranking is calculated or the sources used. There are bold, completely unsubstantiated claims:<br />
- MORE SOURCES: Alexa rankings are now based on more sources of data to give a better indicator of website popularity<br />
- BETTER RANKINGS: The rankings are an even better indication of website popularity due to new and improved algorithms</p>

<p>Alexa has been much criticized for the inaccuracy of its rankings system, which until now has relied entirely on picking up the web browsing activities of those who have installed its toolbar. This is a skewed population, and there are various ways to game the system.</p>

<p>While I don’t necessarily expect Alexa to reveal its exact algorithms, I think people would be far more likely to have confidence in its measures if it gave at least some indication of what the new sources are, or what they look like, or what changes to the algorithm were made. In fact we know less now about how the Alexa rankings are compiled than we did before. Alexa think they’re better. I guess I think they’re better, since I’m ranked higher. But why should anyone else believe they’re better? Tell us please, oh Alexa, just something that supports your claims that Alexa is improved…</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Interview: The future of media and entertainment in 2020</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://rossdawsonblog.com/weblog/archives/2008/04/interview_the_f.html" />
    <id>tag:rossdawsonblog.com,2008://9.1408</id>

    <published>2008-04-17T00:31:40Z</published>
    <updated>2008-04-17T00:40:48Z</updated>

    <summary>Today&apos;s issue of The Australian has a special section on the media industry in 2020, to coincide with the Australian government&apos;s 2020 Summit to be held this weekend. I was interviewed for a feature article titled Watch this space as...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Ross Dawson</name>
        <uri>http://www.rossdawsonblog.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://rossdawsonblog.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Today's issue of The Australian has a special section on the media industry in 2020, to coincide with the <a href="http://www.australia2020.gov.au/">Australian government's 2020 Summit</a> to be held this weekend. I was interviewed for a feature article titled <a href="http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,23551128-17061,00.html">Watch this space as sector goes on move</a> (together with a nice pic of me in the print edition). The article follows:</p>

<p>AUSTRALIANS will double their spending on media and other entertainment by 2020 as the proportion of people's income spent on "weightless" products and services increases, according to futurist Ross Dawson.</p>

<p>Mr Dawson predicted the media and entertainment industry would double in size during the next 12 years and have a 60per cent larger share of the global economy than at present.</p>

<p>"One of the things (that) is going to grow rapidly is the way we consume media ... when we're moving around," Mr Dawson said. "The weight of goods produced in the global economy, while it doubles in size, will stay the same."</p>

<p>Mr Dawson, chairman of the Future Exploration Network, which takes the pulse of the global industry in an annual study, said the media would offer "infinite choice" for consumers by 2020.</p>

<p>In a wide-ranging interview about the changing media landscape ahead of the Government's 2020 Summit, he predicted:</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>* Convergence in home entertainment would lead to one screen in each room through which computer games, video, audio and information would bepiped.</p>

<p>* Much of that information would be available on demand.</p>

<p>* A growing proportion of media revenue would be generated by advertising, as opposed to paid subscriptions. But the jury was still out on the form that advertising would take.</p>

<p>"One of the fundamental questions is about the personalisation or customisation of advertising and of media," Mr Dawson said.</p>

<p>"Advertising can be presented to us based on our own preferences, behaviours and interests.</p>

<p>"It is possible that as a society we will see that there is value in this or it is possible that as a society we would start to reject that (due to privacy concerns). I think the first one is the more likely route."</p>

<p>While fragmentation of media businesses would continue, Australian media companies were likely to continue to enjoy a relatively privileged position.</p>

<p>"So far, the Australian large media companies have been more successful than their peers in other major media markets (in retaining market share compared with new rivals). That will be increasingly challenged."</p>

<p>Other developments would include the migration of newspapers to an electronic format and growth of "advertising aggregators" such as Google.</p>

<p>"Google, if it continues on its current (path), is likely to play a very large role, not just in online advertising but increasingly in other sectors," Mr Dawson said.</p>

<p>"Half of Google's advertising isn't on the Google website, it's on other people's websites, and it also places advertising on television, radio and in newspapers."</p>

<p>Other companies well-placed for the future included Telstra, Optus and Vodafone (which could control the devices on which people consumed media, as well as relationships with those consumers) and Macquarie Media Group, which would benefit from its local media strategy.</p>

<p>But the future of digital free-to-air TV was fuzzy.</p>

<p>"We're unlikely to have many more new digital channels," Mr Dawson said. "It's counter-intuitive in terms of the actual cost of running a TV station."</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

</feed>
