| Main |

I recently gave a presentation at an offsite meeting of the leadership team of a global professional services firm. I was asked to speak about the future of business, and to be provocative, which is usually my objective in that kind of situation – it’s not very valuable if you can’t get people to think differently.

I discussed the driving forces of global business, and then gave them three ‘propositions’ of how I saw the future of business. One of the three propositions, which was really the underlying theme of my presentation, was ‘High performance organizations will thrive on uncertainty and lack of control.’

When you look at what has really changed in the best performing organizations of today compared to say those of a couple of decades ago, this is at the heart of the matter. Executives used to be in control, know what was happening, and to direct the company’s activities in detail to achieve success. That doesn’t work any more.

As I told the audience, we all know CEOs who like being fully in control of the situation. Unless they can quickly change who they are, they are not well suited to the world of today and tomorrow, and will almost inevitably fail. Their successors will be completely comfortable with uncertainty, lack of control, and guiding a path to success from that base.

There are many ways in which this shift to uncertainty and lack of control has been manifested in recent years. Unquestionably one of the most prominent has been the rise of social media, which gives unparalleled power to the voice to consumers and staff, and puts many key issues outside the sphere of complete control. Of course they can always be influenced, guided, and shaped, however only if you acknowledge the lack of control and go with it, rather than trying to jam the genie back into the bottle.

However there are many other aspects to this lack of control. The vicissitudes of global economies have always impacted businesses, yet their unpredictability has been underlined in recent years. One of the prime drivers in the economy today is shared value creation, notably across extended value chains and in distributed innovation. Massive uncertainties around intellectual property, value allocation, and competitive boundaries emerge from this, yet taking the option of steering clear of these issues means forgoing the greatest potential for value creation.

In the discussion time after my presentation, one executive said ‘This means we’re stuffed!’, given the firm and its partners’ intense desire for certainty and control, and their unwillingness to let go even where it is evident they need to let go. However the first step on that path is the recognition that change is required. From there, leaders and staff can undertake to shift their attitudes and behaviors, and those who are better suited to a world of uncertainty can take the relay from those who are not.

I wrote a little while ago about Why scenario thinking (more than scenario planning) is critical for executives today. There are many ways to help executives and organizations shift how they think and work, to embrace uncertainty and understand how they can best shape their future. In many cases one of the best approaches is to use scenario planning, partly to help understand the uncertainties in the future industry landscape and to build robust strategies, but often more to assist executives to change their responses to uncertainty and lack of control.

It is possible that some medium performance organizations will still be founded on the desire for certainty and control. However I don’t doubt that the truly high performance organizations of the future will thrive on uncertainty and lack of control.

For the most current insights and trends in the living networks, follow @rossdawson on Twitter!

  • Omega__23

    Very interesting read, thanks for this.

    It is indeed almost impossible to deny that control of businesses over their external environment is rapidly declining (if there is anything form of control left at this point at all), as the external environment is changing ever faster, becoming more complex and more diverse – in other words more uncertain. Social media naturally further accelerates this process and embracing this lack of control is the only way forward.

    The question then is whether this change in external control should be reflected in a change in internal control – in other words, should managers let go?.

    However, lack of internal control is something very different from the lack of external control – no one wants a factory or chemical plant to run out of control, right?! And (big) businesses face more and more stringent legal requirements about being in control internally (SOX!) – with the CEO even having to sign for being in control at the end of the year.

    Therefore, in light of the changing and uncertain external world I think that the debate on internal control should not be about trying to stay in control or not, but about being able to learn about, reflect on and adapt to the more and more uncertain external environment – in other words to be agile/flexible and open/ambidextrous. This will allow the organization to stay in control (operationally) but also allow reacting fast and in time when needed.

    The above of course implies giving (some?) more ‘freedom’ to people to decide themselves on what to focus their attention on to best bring the business forward, which raises the question how far this internal balance (between ‘control’ & ‘freedom’) should be shifted in light of the changing and uncertain external world – can we all be self-managing entrepreneurs or do we still need a boss?

    As a side note, in a way it is the old debate between putting your business resources into exploitation of what you have vs. into exploration of the new.

    • http://www.rossdawsonblog.com Ross Dawson

      Absolutely, I am not suggesting that everything is open slather. There are many things that do need tight control for a variety of reasons.

      However there are many things that do not. So yes the ‘ambidextrous’ capabilities are what is required – being good at control where it is warranted, and allowing value to emerge in other cases.

  • cdavis

    Interesting.  Some psychologists believe that anxiety=uncertainty+lack of control.  What does this say about our work/business environment today?

  • http://twitter.com/Arleneuc Arlene Murchinson
  • Cheapbagsale1

AHT GROUP VENTURES & FEATURED CONTENT

http://ahtgroup.com/
http://www.futureexploration.net/
http://rossdawson.com/
http://crowdsourcingresults.com/
http://rossdawsonblog.com/weblog/archives/2011/01/zeitgeist-2011-anxiety-mobility-blending-indulgence-immersion-wrath-nudity-and-more.html
http://smetechnologyforum.com/
http://ideavisualization.net/
http://rossdawsonblog.com/
http://rossdawsonblog.com/weblog/archives/2010/12/map_of_the_deca.html

About the Blog author

Ross Dawson Photo

Ross Dawson is globally recognized as a leading futurist, entrepreneur, keynote speaker, strategy advisor, and bestselling author. He is Founding Chairman of AHT Group, which consists of 3 companies: consulting, publishing, and ventures firm Advanced Human Technologies, future and strategy firm Future Exploration Network, and events company The Insight Exchange.

Ross is author most recently of Getting Results From Crowds, the prescient Living Networks, which anticipated the social network revolution, the Amazon.com bestseller Developing Knowledge-Based Client Relationships, and Implementing Enterprise 2.0. (click on the links for free chapter downloads). He is based in Sydney and San Francisco with his wife jewellery designer Victoria Buckley and two beautiful young daughters.

Twitter

Contact me

Go to main blog page

UPCOMING EVENT

Crowdsourcing Week 2013

FEATURED WEBSITE

RossDason.com

Subscribe

 RSS

Archives